Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upAdd `initial-values` matrix parameter to Generic DID Parameters #84
+11
−0
Conversation
|
Just a note that we're using lowercase terms now for everything.. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Wasn't the original suggestion that the value of this parameter would be a complete initial DID document? Are you now proposing that the value could be more flexible, e.g. anything that helps the DID to be resolved when otherwise that would not (yet) be possible? I think both are interesting ideas to explore! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Though some methods (Sidetree-based ones) would use the parameter to pass
the initial DID Document state, I figured there's no reason to constrict it
to that exact value, given other methods could use different values/formats
of values for their needs.
…On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 12:32 AM Markus Sabadello ***@***.***> wrote:
Wasn't the original suggestion that the value of this parameter would be a
complete initial DID document? Are you now proposing that the value could
be more flexible, e.g. anything that helps the DID to be resolved when
otherwise that would not (yet) be possible? I think both are interesting
ideas to explore!
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#84>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABAFSVGZNV5OCJDQEKB6LTQP2UBFANCNFSM4JDJVDCQ>
.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
I have connected my GitHub and W3C accounts, so the IPR flag on this should be good to go now. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Hey @csuwildcat you asked on today's 2019-11-05 DID WG call what's the next step for this. I think this is a good feature, but we haven't gotten much other feedback from the WG yet. If you don't mind I'd like to wait a bit longer, perhaps until we've had an opportunity to discuss matrix parameters during one of the upcoming WG calls.. |
| <code>initial-values</code> | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td> | ||
| Some <a>DID methods</a> may require an interim period of time (e.g. block intervals) before a new identifier and its initial <a>DID document</a> |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
TallTed
Nov 5, 2019
Contributor
Suggested change
| Some <a>DID methods</a> may require an interim period of time (e.g. block intervals) before a new identifier and its initial <a>DID document</a> | |
| Some <a>DID methods</a> may require an interim period of time (e.g., a block | |
| interval) before a new identifier and its initial <a>DID document</a> |
| </td> | ||
| <td> | ||
| Some <a>DID methods</a> may require an interim period of time (e.g. block intervals) before a new identifier and its initial <a>DID document</a> | ||
| state is propagated within the underlying <a>DID registry</a>. To make resolution of a DID possible during this period, <a>DID methods</a> may require passage of additional values |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
TallTed
Nov 5, 2019
Contributor
Suggested change
| state is propagated within the underlying <a>DID registry</a>. To make resolution of a DID possible during this period, <a>DID methods</a> may require passage of additional values | |
| state are propagated within the underlying <a>DID registry</a>. To enable resolution | |
| of a DID during this period, <a>DID methods</a> may require that additional values |
| <td> | ||
| Some <a>DID methods</a> may require an interim period of time (e.g. block intervals) before a new identifier and its initial <a>DID document</a> | ||
| state is propagated within the underlying <a>DID registry</a>. To make resolution of a DID possible during this period, <a>DID methods</a> may require passage of additional values | ||
| to their resolver logic to ensure correct processing. <a>DID methods</a> SHOULD use the `initial-values` parameter if passage of any such values is necessary. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
TallTed
Nov 5, 2019
Contributor
Suggested change
| to their resolver logic to ensure correct processing. <a>DID methods</a> SHOULD use the `initial-values` parameter if passage of any such values is necessary. | |
| be passed to their resolver logic. <a>DID methods</a> SHOULD use the | |
| `initial-values` parameter when such values are necessary. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
csuwildcat commentedOct 22, 2019
•
edited by pr-preview bot
This PR is intended to start the next phase of discussion around the needs highlighted in issue #70, regarding the ability to resolve DIDs for Methods that require a period of time before their inclusion/state has been propagated in an underling trust system (blockchain, ledger, etc.).
Preview | Diff