Skip to content

ROX-34016: Display init container info next to standard containers#20060

Draft
dvail wants to merge 1 commit intodv/ROX-33571-consolidate-container-displayfrom
dv/ROX-34016-init-container-display-2
Draft

ROX-34016: Display init container info next to standard containers#20060
dvail wants to merge 1 commit intodv/ROX-33571-consolidate-container-displayfrom
dv/ROX-34016-init-container-display-2

Conversation

@dvail
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dvail dvail commented Apr 16, 2026

Description

change me!

User-facing documentation

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

  • added unit tests
  • added e2e tests
  • added regression tests
  • added compatibility tests
  • modified existing tests

How I validated my change

change me!

@dvail dvail requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2026 18:24
@dvail
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dvail commented Apr 16, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 16, 2026

🚀 Build Images Ready

Images are ready for commit 0ce7447. To use with deploy scripts:

export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.11.x-663-g0ce74471d5

| 'ROX_CISA_KEV'
| 'ROX_CVE_FIX_TIMESTAMP'
| 'ROX_FLATTEN_IMAGE_DATA'
| 'ROX_INIT_CONTAINER_SUPPORT'
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This alone can cause console warning:
https://github.com/stackrox/stackrox/blob/master/ui/apps/platform/src/providers/FeatureFlagProvider.tsx#L33-L35

Is there another unmerged contribution for corresponding changes?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gah, this was supposed to be a draft. The BE equivalent is in another PR, and I still need to add the enablement for CI scripts. I'll move this to a draft state, feel free to ignore until switched back to ready-for-review.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.60%. Comparing base (7fb00ab) to head (0ce7447).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                              Coverage Diff                               @@
##           dv/ROX-33571-consolidate-container-display   #20060      +/-   ##
==============================================================================
- Coverage                                       49.61%   49.60%   -0.01%     
==============================================================================
  Files                                            2765     2765              
  Lines                                          208643   208643              
==============================================================================
- Hits                                           103523   103505      -18     
- Misses                                          97464    97479      +15     
- Partials                                         7656     7659       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 49.60% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@dvail dvail marked this pull request as draft April 16, 2026 19:27
@dvail dvail changed the title ROX-34016: Display init container info next to standard containers (ai-assisted) ROX-34016: Display init container info next to standard containers Apr 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants