Skip to content

Bump peter-evans/create-or-update-comment from 4 to 5 in the actions group #88

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
PDowney merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2025
Merged

Bump peter-evans/create-or-update-comment from 4 to 5 in the actions group #88

PDowney merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2025

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Bumps the actions group with 1 update: peter-evans/create-or-update-comment.

Updates peter-evans/create-or-update-comment from 4 to 5

Release notes

Sourced from peter-evans/create-or-update-comment's releases.

Create or Update Comment v5.0.0

⚙️ Requires Actions Runner v2.327.1 or later if you are using a self-hosted runner for Node 24 support.

What's Changed

... (truncated)

Commits
  • e8674b0 feat: v5 (#439)
  • fffe59e build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 18.19.127 to 18.19.129 (#438)
  • 076d572 build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 18.19.126 to 18.19.127 (#437)
  • 86a2645 build(deps-dev): bump @​vercel/ncc from 0.38.3 to 0.38.4 (#436)
  • be17e0c build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 18.19.124 to 18.19.126 (#435)
  • ef75eae build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 18.19.123 to 18.19.124 (#433)
  • 82a7ad0 build(deps): bump actions/setup-node from 4 to 5 (#432)
  • f7c845d build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 18.19.122 to 18.19.123 (#430)
  • 5da8e07 build(deps-dev): bump eslint-plugin-prettier from 5.5.3 to 5.5.4 (#428)
  • 2de7f66 build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 18.19.121 to 18.19.122 (#427)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency (unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot unignore <dependency name> will remove all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition> will remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore conditions

@dependabot
Bump peter-evans/create-or-update-comment in the actions group
33e84ad 
Bumps the actions group with 1 update: [peter-evans/create-or-update-comment](https://github.com/peter-evans/create-or-update-comment).


Updates `peter-evans/create-or-update-comment` from 4 to 5
- [Release notes](https://github.com/peter-evans/create-or-update-comment/releases)
- [Commits](peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v4...v5)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: peter-evans/create-or-update-comment
  dependency-version: '5'
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
  dependency-group: actions
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Thanks for contributing to EngineScript! 🎉

If your PR fixes an issue or relates to a specific environment, please consider including the sanitized output
of es.debug to show the environment where you tested your changes.
Remember to remove any sensitive information before sharing.

We'll review your PR soon!

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2025

🤖 Gemini Issue Analysis

As an expert Linux system administrator and LEMP stack automation specialist, here is my analysis of the new SonarQube comment in the context of the EngineScript repository and the original dependency update issue.

Executive Summary

The new comment from SonarQube is an automated status report from the project's Continuous Integration (CI) pipeline. It indicates that the proposed dependency update in this Pull Request (PR) has passed all static code analysis checks for security and quality. While this is a positive signal for merging the PR, it does not provide information about the potential runtime or server environment impact mentioned in the original issue's release notes. The primary administrative concern remains the potential need to update self-hosted GitHub Actions runners.

Detailed Analysis

1. How does this comment relate to the original server configuration issue?

The comment is a direct, automated consequence of the original issue, which is a Pull Request (PR #88). Here's the relationship:

  • CI/CD Workflow Trigger: The creation of the Dependabot PR to update the peter-evans/create-or-update-comment action triggered a CI workflow defined in the EngineScript repository (likely in a .github/workflows/*.yml file).
  • Automated Quality Gate: One of the steps in this workflow is a static code analysis scan by SonarQube Cloud. This tool checks the codebase for new bugs, vulnerabilities, and "code smells" that might be introduced by the changes in the PR.
  • Status Report: The comment is the final report from that scan. The "Quality Gate passed" message signifies that the changes (in this case, updating a single line in a workflow file) did not introduce any new issues according to SonarQube's ruleset.

In short, the comment is an automated health check on the code change, not the server configuration itself.

2. What new server administration information or clarification is provided?

The comment provides no new information about the live LEMP server administration or its configuration. It is a report on the project's code quality, not its runtime environment.

However, it provides the following indirect insights:

  • CI Pipeline Health: It confirms that the project's automated quality assurance process is functioning correctly for this PR.
  • Change Impact (Code-Level): It confirms that, from a static analysis perspective, the simple version bump of the GitHub Action is clean and introduces no detectable security flaws or bugs into the repository's codebase.
  • Expected Metrics: The report of 0.0% Coverage on New Code and 0.0% Duplication on New Code is expected and normal for a dependency update that adds no new lines of executable code to the main application.

Crucially, this SonarQube analysis cannot detect the server-side requirement mentioned in the original release notes: Requires Actions Runner v2.327.1 or later if you are using a self-hosted runner for Node 24 support.

3. Are there bash script or configuration file implications from this comment?

There are no implications for any bash scripts or server configuration files (e.g., Nginx, PHP, MariaDB configs) from this SonarQube comment. The comment is purely informational for the PR lifecycle.

The original issue (the dependency update) has a potential implication, but only for the infrastructure that runs the CI/CD jobs, not the production LEMP server:

  • If EngineScript uses self-hosted GitHub Actions runners, a system administrator must verify that the runner software is version v2.327.1 or newer. This might involve running actions-runner/config.sh --version on the runner machine and updating it if necessary.
  • If EngineScript uses standard GitHub-hosted runners, there are no implications, as GitHub manages their versions.

4. What follow-up server administration actions are suggested?

Based on the combination of the original issue and this new comment, the recommended actions are:

  1. Acknowledge the Passed Check: Treat the SonarQube comment as a "green light" from the automated code quality perspective. The change is considered safe in that regard.

  2. Verify the Runner Environment (CRITICAL): The most important action is to address the requirement from the v5 release notes.

    • Action: Determine if the project uses self-hosted or GitHub-hosted runners for its workflows.
    • If Self-Hosted: The administrator must log into the runner machine(s) and confirm the version. If the version is below v2.327.1, the runner software must be updated before this PR is merged to prevent future CI job failures.
    • If GitHub-Hosted: No action is needed for the runner environment.

  3. Approve and Merge: Once the runner environment is confirmed to be compatible (or confirmed to be irrelevant because GitHub-hosted runners are used), the PR is safe to merge. The SonarQube check provides the final piece of confidence that the change doesn't negatively impact code quality.

Analysis performed by Gemini AI on Fri Oct 3 09:24:12 UTC 2025

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2025

🎉 EngineScript Nginx Build Test PASSED 🎉

Nginx core component built successfully:

  • Nginx: ✅ Success

✅ Ready for deployment testing!

@PDowney PDowney merged commit 4c3bba1 into master Oct 10, 2025
9 checks passed
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/actions-85cd2e0cc6 branch October 10, 2025 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

automated automation dependencies maintenance security

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@PDowney