Skip to content

Comments

chore: fix some comments#1778

Merged
Manav-Aggarwal merged 1 commit intoevstack:mainfrom
yuhangcangqian:main
Jul 26, 2024
Merged

chore: fix some comments#1778
Manav-Aggarwal merged 1 commit intoevstack:mainfrom
yuhangcangqian:main

Conversation

@yuhangcangqian
Copy link
Contributor

@yuhangcangqian yuhangcangqian commented Jul 19, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Overview

fix some comments

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected minor typos in comments across various files for improved clarity, including "conensus" to "consensus" and "potenial" to "potential."

  • Documentation

    • Updated comments for better alignment with variable names and function descriptions, enhancing overall understanding for developers.

@yuhangcangqian
chore: fix some comments
dc89302 
Signed-off-by: yuhangcangqian <cuibuwei@qq.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The recent changes across several files include minor corrections and updates to comments for clarity and accuracy. Variable names and terminology have been standardized, enhancing the readability of the code and documentation without altering any underlying functionality. These adjustments ensure that the codebase remains clear and maintainable, promoting better understanding for future developers.

Changes

Files Change Summary
block/manager.go, mempool/clist_mempool_test.go, specs/lazy-adr/adr-004-core-types.md, third_party/celestia-app/appconsts/appconsts.go Minor textual corrections and comment updates for clarity, including variable name adjustments and spell-checks.

Poem

🐇 In the code where clarity thrives,
A rabbit hops, where logic jives.
Comments polished, names align,
A clean codebase, oh how it shines!
With every tweak, the code's more bright,
Let's celebrate this joyful byte! 🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RollkitBot RollkitBot requested review from a team, tuxcanfly, tzdybal and yarikbratashchuk and removed request for a team July 19, 2024 10:10
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 19, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 723c7c4 and dc89302.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • block/manager.go (1 hunks)
  • mempool/clist_mempool_test.go (1 hunks)
  • specs/lazy-adr/adr-004-core-types.md (1 hunks)
  • third_party/celestia-app/appconsts/appconsts.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • block/manager.go
  • mempool/clist_mempool_test.go
  • specs/lazy-adr/adr-004-core-types.md
  • third_party/celestia-app/appconsts/appconsts.go

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 42.73%. Comparing base (c9d8467) to head (dc89302).
Report is 156 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (c9d8467) and HEAD (dc89302). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (c9d8467) HEAD (dc89302)
2 1
Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1778      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   50.23%   42.73%   -7.51%     
==========================================
  Files          52       76      +24     
  Lines        6762     9966    +3204     
==========================================
+ Hits         3397     4259     +862     
- Misses       3024     4997    +1973     
- Partials      341      710     +369

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

tuxcanfly
tuxcanfly approved these changes Jul 25, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK.

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into evstack:main with commit 448d086 Jul 26, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Closed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Closed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2025
Merged
@tac0turtle tac0turtle removed this from Evolve Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@tuxcanfly tuxcanfly tuxcanfly approved these changes

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal approved these changes

@tzdybal tzdybal Awaiting requested review from tzdybal

@yarikbratashchuk yarikbratashchuk Awaiting requested review from yarikbratashchuk

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@yuhangcangqian @tuxcanfly @Manav-Aggarwal