Skip to content

Comments

chore: change error to debug when no batch to process#1893

Merged
gupadhyaya merged 1 commit intoevstack:mainfrom
gupadhyaya:fix-err
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

chore: change error to debug when no batch to process#1893
gupadhyaya merged 1 commit intoevstack:mainfrom
gupadhyaya:fix-err

Conversation

@gupadhyaya
Copy link
Contributor

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya commented Nov 4, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Fixes #1892 1892

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced logging for the block creation and publishing process, improving visibility into transaction handling.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Refined error handling in the block publishing method to provide clearer context during transaction retrieval.

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya requested a review from MSevey November 4, 2024 05:56
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Manager struct and its methods in the block/manager.go file, primarily enhancing logging and error handling during the block creation and publishing processes. Key updates include the addition of debug logs to provide better visibility when waiting for transactions and a refined error handling approach that replaces error messages with debug logs when no transactions are available. These changes aim to improve the clarity of the block publishing flow while maintaining the existing control flow.

Changes

File Change Summary
block/manager.go - Added logging statements to the publishBlock method for better visibility during block creation.
- Moved log message for block creation to ensure it's logged only when a new block is created.
- Refined error handling in publishBlock to use debug logs instead of error messages when no transactions are available.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Change error message to debug log when no transactions (1892) ✅

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C: sequencing

Suggested reviewers

  • tzdybal
  • MSevey
  • Manav-Aggarwal

Poem

🐇 In the block where transactions play,
A log now shines to light the way.
Errors turned to whispers low,
As empty batches start to flow.
With each new block, we hop with glee,
In the world of code, so wild and free! 🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya requested a review from tzdybal November 4, 2024 05:56
@RollkitBot RollkitBot requested review from a team and yarikbratashchuk and removed request for a team November 4, 2024 05:56
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya requested review from a team and Manav-Aggarwal November 4, 2024 05:56
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya changed the title change error to debug when no batch to process chore: change error to debug when no batch to process Nov 4, 2024
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 42.46%. Comparing base (41cdd7a) to head (958279f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
block/manager.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1893      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.45%   42.46%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          79       79              
  Lines       12692    12693       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         5388     5390       +2     
+ Misses       6575     6574       -1     
  Partials      729      729

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Nov 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
block/manager.go (1)

1078-1079: LGTM! Changed error to debug log when no transactions are available.

The change from error to debug level is appropriate as having no transactions to process is a normal condition, not an error state. This aligns well with the PR objectives and improves log clarity.

Consider adding test coverage for different transaction availability scenarios to ensure logging behavior is consistent.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 1078-1079: block/manager.go#L1078-L1079
Added lines #L1078 - L1079 were not covered by tests

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41cdd7a and 958279f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • block/manager.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
block/manager.go

[warning] 1078-1079: block/manager.go#L1078-L1079
Added lines #L1078 - L1079 were not covered by tests

[warning] 1085-1085: block/manager.go#L1085
Added line #L1085 was not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (1)
block/manager.go (1)

1085-1085: LGTM! Added informative log for block creation.

The new info log provides good visibility into the block creation process.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 1085-1085: block/manager.go#L1085
Added line #L1085 was not covered by tests

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into evstack:main with commit ca746d0 Nov 4, 2024
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya deleted the fix-err branch November 4, 2024 08:43
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2024
Merged
@tac0turtle tac0turtle removed this from Evolve Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal approved these changes

@MSevey MSevey Awaiting requested review from MSevey

@yarikbratashchuk yarikbratashchuk Awaiting requested review from yarikbratashchuk

+1 more reviewer

@tzdybal tzdybal tzdybal approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

chore(sequencer): error when no transaction until publishing empty block

3 participants

@gupadhyaya @tzdybal @Manav-Aggarwal