Skip to content

Conversation

@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator

@hiyuchang hiyuchang commented Jul 28, 2025

Description

  1. Addstrategy=duplicate_informative (from Polaris)
  2. Unlikelines reward (from https://github.com/AndreHe02/rewarding-unlikely-release)

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hiyuchang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new AddStrategy called DuplicateInformativeAddStrategy to the trinity framework. This strategy aims to enhance the experience replay mechanism by intelligently selecting and duplicating only those experiences that exhibit significant reward variance within a task, as referenced by the Polaris project. The goal is to ensure that the system primarily processes and learns from more 'informative' data, potentially leading to more effective and efficient learning outcomes.

Highlights

  • New Strategy Implementation: I've implemented DuplicateInformativeAddStrategy, a new experience addition strategy inspired by the Polaris project. This strategy is designed to select and duplicate experiences based on their reward variance.
  • Experience Filtering and Duplication Logic: The core logic in DuplicateInformativeAddStrategy filters incoming experiences. It groups them by task and only considers tasks where the reward variance exceeds a specified variance_threshold. These 'informative' experiences are then duplicated until the total number of experiences reaches the original target size, with duplicated task IDs being offset to maintain uniqueness.
  • Module Integration: The new DuplicateInformativeAddStrategy class has been registered with the ADD_STRATEGY registry under the name 'duplicate_informative' and is now exposed through the trinity.algorithm.add_strategy package's __init__.py file, making it available for use.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new DuplicateInformativeAddStrategy for adding experiences to the buffer. The new strategy filters experiences based on reward variance and then duplicates the informative ones to reach a target count.

My review has identified a few issues:

  • A critical issue with a misleading docstring that doesn't match the implementation.
  • Some high-severity issues related to code style (imports inside a method) and performance (inefficient sampling).
  • Medium-severity concerns about code duplication.

Please address these points to improve the code's correctness, performance, and maintainability.

@hiyuchang hiyuchang changed the title Add duplicate_informative strategy [WIP] Add some training tricks for RLVR Jul 29, 2025
@hiyuchang hiyuchang changed the title [WIP] Add some training tricks for RLVR Add some training tricks for RLVR Aug 1, 2025
@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-algorithm

1 similar comment
@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-algorithm

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
10 10 0 0 0 0 3ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_correct_bias_strategy 1ms
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_duplicate_add_strategy 1ms
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_grpo_args 1ms
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_reward_variance_strategy 1ms
tests/algorithm/add_strategy_test.py::TestAddStrategy::test_step_wise_grpo_strategy 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@yanxi-chen yanxi-chen merged commit 9d2407e into modelscope:main Aug 1, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants