Skip to content

Conversation

@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

As the title says.

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @hiyuchang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the observability and robustness of the system by introducing comprehensive timing metrics across key components like the Explorer, Trainer, and DataJuicer client. It also refines existing metric handling, standardizes naming conventions, and makes the metric aggregation utility more resilient to edge cases, ultimately providing clearer performance insights and a more stable metric collection process.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Timing Metrics: Introduced new timing metrics across Explorer, Trainer, and DataJuicer components to precisely measure various operational durations, such as total exploration time, evaluation time, and data processing time.
  • Metric Name Standardization: Standardized metric names in MixSampleStrategy and its documentation, changing 'read_time' to 'time/read_experience' and 'gather_time' to 'time/gather_experience' for better clarity and consistency.
  • Robust Metric Aggregation: Improved the gather_metrics utility function to gracefully handle empty input lists, preventing ValueError and simplifying its usage across the codebase.
  • GRPO Advantage Metric Refinement: Enhanced the GRPO advantage calculation to explicitly sum and report 'skipped_count' as 'filtered_count', providing more detailed insights into filtered experiences.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix and improve metrics, particularly timing metrics, across the system. The changes include:

  • Standardizing metric names for better clarity (e.g., time/read_experience).
  • Adding timing for operations in DataJuicerClient, Explorer, and Trainer.
  • Refactoring gather_metrics to handle empty lists gracefully, which simplifies calling code by removing redundant try-except blocks.

The implementation is mostly solid, especially the robust timing logic in explorer.py and the simplification in gather_metrics. However, I've identified a logical issue in the new timing implementation within trinity/trainer/trainer.py where the metric time/train_total_time does not measure the full duration between syncs as intended. My review includes a detailed comment on how to correct this to ensure the metric is accurate and consistent with other parts of the codebase. Overall, good improvements to observability.

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator

pan-x-c commented Oct 24, 2025

/unittest-diff

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
91 87 1 3 0 0 2.5s

Failed Tests

Failed Tests ❌ Fail Message
❌ tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std The test failed in the call phase due to an assertion error

Skipped

Tests Status
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::TestAgentScopeWorkflowAdapter::test_adapter skipped ⏭️
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestMultiModalGRPO::test_trainer skipped ⏭️
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestMultiModalSFT::test_trainer skipped ⏭️

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_std_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_duplicate_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_correct_bias 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_gspo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownEval::test_explorer 58ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownNoEval::test_explorer 58ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerGSM8k::test_explorer 205ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::ServeTest::test_serve 69ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_async_workflow 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_concurrent_operations 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_get_results 23ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_multi_step_execution 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_non_repeatable_workflow 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_all_methods 15ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_restart_after_stop 10ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_split_tasks 8ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_stepwise_experience_eid 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all 8ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all_timeout_with_multi_batch 14ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_reward_propagation_workflow_0 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_reward_propagation_workflow_1 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_step_wise_reward_workflow_0 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_step_wise_reward_workflow_1 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_raise_error 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_stop_at_max_env_steps 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_gsm8k_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_boxed_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_complex_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_eval_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_fraction_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_rm_gallery_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_repeatable_0 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_repeatable_1 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_resettable_0 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_resettable_1 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::MultiTurnWorkflowTest_0::test_multi_turn_workflow 19ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::MultiTurnWorkflowTest_1::test_multi_turn_workflow 19ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::TestAgentScopeWorkflowAdapter::test_adapter ⏭️ 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::TestWorkflowRunner::test_workflow_runner 1ms
tests/service/data_juicer_test.py::TestDataJuicer::test_config 1ms
tests/service/data_juicer_test.py::TestDataJuicer::test_server_start 21ms
tests/service/data_juicer_test.py::TestDataJuicerExperiencePipeline::test_data_juicer_operators 23ms
tests/service/data_juicer_test.py::TestDataJuicerTaskPipeline::test_data_juicer_task_pipeline 14ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerCountdown_0_fsdp::test_trainer 137ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerCountdown_1_megatron::test_trainer 259ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestStepAheadAsyncRL::test_trainer 53ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerGSM8K_0_fsdp::test_trainer 55ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerGSM8K_1_fsdp2::test_trainer 51ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerGSM8K_2_fsdp::test_trainer 64ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerGSM8K_3_fsdp2::test_trainer 62ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerSFTWarmupGSM8K::test_trainer 100ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerDPO::test_trainer 40ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerSFT::test_trainer 37ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerToolsSFT::test_trainer_tools 37ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode_0_fsdp::test_fully_async_mode 82ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode_1_fsdp::test_fully_async_mode 82ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode_2_megatron::test_fully_async_mode 141ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerCheckpointSave_0_fsdp::test_trainer 96ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerCheckpointSave_1_megatron::test_trainer 304ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerMIX::test_trainer 57ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestMultiModalGRPO::test_trainer ⏭️ 1ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestMultiModalSFT::test_trainer ⏭️ 1ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerLoRA::test_trainer 150ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_both_boxed_and_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_both_boxed_and_not_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_empty_ground_truth 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_empty_solution_string 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_multiple_boxed_answers_in_solution 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_solution_boxed_truth_raw_and_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_solution_boxed_truth_raw_and_not_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_solution_not_boxed 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_solution_raw_and_ground_truth_boxed_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestMathEvalUtils::test_extract_answer 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestMathEvalUtils::test_verify_math_answer 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestEvalUtils::test_is_equiv 1ms
tests/utils/log_test.py::LogTest::test_actor_log 4ms
tests/utils/log_test.py::LogTest::test_group_by_node 4ms
tests/utils/log_test.py::LogTest::test_no_actor_log 1ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_load_plugins_local 1ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_load_plugins_remote 9ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_passing_custom_class 5ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-algorithm

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
13 12 1 0 0 0 4ms

Failed Tests

Failed Tests ❌ Fail Message
❌ tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std The test failed in the call phase due to an assertion error

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_std_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_duplicate_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_correct_bias 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_gspo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-algorithm

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
13 13 0 0 0 0 4ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_std_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_duplicate_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_correct_bias 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_gspo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator

pan-x-c commented Oct 27, 2025

/unittest-module-explorer

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
36 35 0 1 0 0 549ms

Skipped

Tests Status
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::TestAgentScopeWorkflowAdapter::test_adapter skipped ⏭️

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownEval::test_explorer 61ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownNoEval::test_explorer 54ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerGSM8k::test_explorer 205ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::ServeTest::test_serve 71ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_async_workflow 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_concurrent_operations 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_get_results 24ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_multi_step_execution 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_non_repeatable_workflow 5ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_all_methods 15ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_restart_after_stop 9ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_split_tasks 8ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_stepwise_experience_eid 6ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all 8ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all_timeout_with_multi_batch 14ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_reward_propagation_workflow_0 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_reward_propagation_workflow_1 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_step_wise_reward_workflow_0 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_step_wise_reward_workflow_1 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_raise_error 1ms
tests/explorer/step_wise_workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflows_stop_at_max_env_steps 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_gsm8k_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_boxed_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_complex_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_eval_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_fraction_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_rm_gallery_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_repeatable_0 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_repeatable_1 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_resettable_0 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_resettable_1 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::MultiTurnWorkflowTest_0::test_multi_turn_workflow 20ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::MultiTurnWorkflowTest_1::test_multi_turn_workflow 18ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::TestAgentScopeWorkflowAdapter::test_adapter ⏭️ 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::TestWorkflowRunner::test_workflow_runner 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator

pan-x-c commented Oct 27, 2025

/unittest-module-common

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
33 33 0 0 0 0 319ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 32ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_config_flatten 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_default_workflow 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 3ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_max_token_len_per_gpu_set_correctly 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_update_config_from_ray_cluster 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_hf_datasets_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_gather_experiences_with_custom_fields 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 57ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 36ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 47ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestModelLen_0::test_model_len 21ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestModelLen_1::test_model_len 21ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 24ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAsyncAPIServer::test_api_async 24ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask_with_tools 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_0_deepseek_r1::test_api_tool_calls 22ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_1::test_api_tool_calls 20ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@pan-x-c pan-x-c merged commit 4576dab into modelscope:main Oct 27, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants