Review requested:

• @nodejs/web-standards

I think we do have the machinery elsewhere already that would allow this to not blanket skip everything

Furthermore the status files can be .cjs for setting expectations for individual tests dynamically.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.72%. Comparing base (2ae6d8f) to head (5145814).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #62019      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.74%   89.72%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         676      676              
  Lines      206072   206069       -3     
  Branches    39507    39514       +7     
==========================================
- Hits       184936   184902      -34     
- Misses      13303    13310       +7     
- Partials     7833     7857      +24     

I think we do have the machinery elsewhere already that would allow this to not blanket skip everything

That's true, but tbh that seems hardly worth the maintenance burden, each version of Ada will pass a different subset of the tests.

I've removed the --without-intl check as the failure I was seeing was only related to the Ada version I were using.

Ok, if this is limited to shared ada ✅

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/71484/