Conversation
webknjaz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great at glance! Does it need an entire hour to complete though? If not, I'd make the timeout smaller.
|
I just copied the |
|
!buildbot emscripten |
|
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @hoodmane for commit 9da3ed3 🤖 Results will be shown at: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F146198%2Fmerge The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: The builders matched are:
|
|
So it took 19m 28s with no cache. But the cache is not working yet. |
|
!buildbot emscripten |
|
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @hoodmane for commit d77a339 🤖 Results will be shown at: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F146198%2Fmerge The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: The builders matched are:
|
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
|
!buildbot Emscripten |
|
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @hoodmane for commit 4276a51 🤖 Results will be shown at: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F146198%2Fmerge The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: The builders matched are:
|
|
!buildbot Emscripten |
|
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @hoodmane for commit 4276a51 🤖 Results will be shown at: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F146198%2Fmerge The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: The builders matched are:
|
Time:
By comparison, the build bot took 32m 8s with cache. I guess the github action runners are quite a bit faster than the instance running the build bot.