cc @brettcannon

When you're done making the requested changes, leave the comment: I have made the requested changes; please review again.

@brettcannon: I updated the PR to mention also load_module() removal, and fix test_zipimport... But now, I feel that I removed too many lines in the tests! Maybe the tests should be fixed instead?

Problem: I don't know how to fix the packdir2 tests:

         mod_path = packdir2 + TESTMOD
         mod_name = module_path_to_dotted_name(mod_path)
-        mod = importlib.import_module(mod_name)
-        self.assertTrue(mod_name in sys.modules)
-        self.assertIsNone(zi.get_source(TESTPACK))
-        self.assertIsNone(zi.get_source(mod_path))
-        self.assertEqual(zi.get_filename(mod_path), mod.__file__)
-        # To pass in the module name instead of the path, we must use the
-        # right importer
-        loader = mod.__spec__.loader
-        self.assertIsNone(loader.get_source(mod_name))
-        self.assertEqual(loader.get_filename(mod_name), mod.__file__)

I don't know how to fix the packdir2 test

How is it failing?

Maybe only do the find_*() methods in this PR and worry about load_module() in another one?

Maybe only do the find_*() methods in this PR and worry about load_module() in another one?

Good idea! I modified this PR to only remove find_loader() and find_module() methods: keep load_module() for now (it can be removed in a separated PR).

@brettcannon: Would you mind to review the updated PR? Now it only removes find_loader() and find_module() methods, and it only removes the bare minimum lines in test_zipimport.py.

Once the PR gets approved, I will solve the Doc/whatsnew/3.12.rst conflict.

@vstinner LGTM! And an FYI for anyone else who reviews, the get_filename() function gets used in other places, so it still gets tested.

Thanks for the reviews @warsaw and @brettcannon! It's easier to modify zipimport since @serhiy-storchaka rewrote it in pure Python :-)