Skip to content

build: Switch Konflux UI builds from NodeJS 18 to 20#14086

Merged
msugakov merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
misha/switch-konflux-to-node-20
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

build: Switch Konflux UI builds from NodeJS 18 to 20#14086
msugakov merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
misha/switch-konflux-to-node-20

Conversation

@msugakov
Copy link
Contributor

@msugakov msugakov commented Feb 3, 2025

Description

See https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C7ERNFL0M/p1738574728275579

Mark reports that his local builds are in fact powered by 20. GHA builds also use 20.

Unfortunately, there's no 22 in the catalog for ubi8 base (see here), therefore setting the builder stage to 20.

User-facing documentation

  • CHANGELOG is updated OR update is not needed
  • documentation PR is created and is linked above OR is not needed

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

No change.

How I validated my change

I'm only going to check that UI build completes successfully. I'm not going to test the UI functioning as part of this change.
Per the investigation in the Slack thread, UI is already built and tested with 20 on GHA.

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Images are ready for the commit at bdab180.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.7.x-600-gbdab180346.

@msugakov
Copy link
Contributor Author

msugakov commented Feb 3, 2025

@msugakov msugakov marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2025 18:43
Copy link
Contributor

@pedrottimark pedrottimark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super, thank you very much. As far as I can read CI results, relevant steps passed.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 48.92%. Comparing base (08a5f73) to head (bdab180).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #14086   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.92%   48.92%           
=======================================
  Files        2500     2500           
  Lines      180852   180852           
=======================================
+ Hits        88474    88480    +6     
+ Misses      85357    85352    -5     
+ Partials     7021     7020    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 48.92% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2025

@msugakov: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/ocp-4-12-qa-e2e-tests bdab180 link false /test ocp-4-12-qa-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-17-scanner-v4-install-tests bdab180 link false /test ocp-4-17-scanner-v4-install-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

@tommartensen tommartensen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@msugakov msugakov merged commit 01d0fb5 into master Feb 4, 2025
97 of 105 checks passed
@msugakov msugakov deleted the misha/switch-konflux-to-node-20 branch February 4, 2025 10:21
shireenf-ibm pushed a commit to shireenf-ibm/stackrox that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants