chore(collector): Bump Collector version to 3.21.0#14188
Conversation
|
/retest |
3fb4b45 to
5fd12f2
Compare
|
Images are ready for the commit at a0240db. To use with deploy scripts, first |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This follows up #13350
LGTM for the changes here. I added one label so that roxctl scan gets really triggered to make sure it does not blow up too early.
I'd suggest you try further grep the repo for collector-slim occurrences (and maybe just -slim) to make sure nothing's left. In a separate PR will be fine.
Co-authored-by: Misha Sugakov <537715+msugakov@users.noreply.github.com>
I did find one last reference in the release scripts #14213 and a small thing in Sensor (here) though I'm not sure there's any harm in the Sensor part. Everything else is either testing that slim mode is translated/ignored correctly, or related to scanner-slim instead. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #14188 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 49.06% 49.06%
=======================================
Files 2515 2515
Lines 182745 182745
=======================================
+ Hits 89655 89658 +3
+ Misses 85970 85968 -2
+ Partials 7120 7119 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@Stringy: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
With the failed tests relating to scanner install (and v4 upgrades), and seem to be flaky elsewhere, I'll merge this now. |
Description
Bumps the Collector version to 3.21.0 in time for the release.
How I validated my change
Tests passing in Collector repo, and on latest CI on master. Otherwise CI in this PR will be enough.