Skip to content

chore(bench): image upsert benchmark#17274

Merged
dashrews78 merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
dashrews/chore-image-upsert-benchmark
Oct 14, 2025
Merged

chore(bench): image upsert benchmark#17274
dashrews78 merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
dashrews/chore-image-upsert-benchmark

Conversation

@dashrews78
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adding benchmarks for image upsert. Will be used to demonstrate improvements in #17200

User-facing documentation

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

  • added unit tests
  • added e2e tests
  • added regression tests
  • added compatibility tests
  • modified existing tests

How I validated my change

This is only a test.

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Contributor

rhacs-bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Images are ready for the commit at 4ebac98.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.10.x-24-g4ebac98af4.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 48.86%. Comparing base (1c5963d) to head (4ebac98).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #17274   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.86%   48.86%           
=======================================
  Files        2720     2720           
  Lines      203364   203364           
=======================================
+ Hits        99371    99381   +10     
+ Misses      96168    96160    -8     
+ Partials     7825     7823    -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 48.86% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@ajheflin ajheflin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only thing I don't love here is the overwriting of the Image IDs with IDs that are of entirely different types than we would have in a real environment. However, given it's just to test the performance when it comes to DB operations, I suppose it's fine in this case

@dashrews78 dashrews78 force-pushed the dashrews/chore-image-upsert-benchmark branch from 48d4588 to 4ebac98 Compare October 14, 2025 15:32
@dashrews78 dashrews78 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 14, 2025 16:16
@dashrews78 dashrews78 merged commit 133a6ec into master Oct 14, 2025
91 checks passed
@dashrews78 dashrews78 deleted the dashrews/chore-image-upsert-benchmark branch October 14, 2025 18:06
vikin91 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
vikin91 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
vikin91 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants