Skip to content

tests: CI tests output nits#19390

Open
parametalol wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
michael/ci-nits
Open

tests: CI tests output nits#19390
parametalol wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
michael/ci-nits

Conversation

@parametalol
Copy link
Contributor

@parametalol parametalol commented Mar 12, 2026

Description

  1. Add a detailed error message in case of LB IP has not been provisioned.
  2. Print source strings to help debugging parse error: Invalid numeric literal at line 26, column 8 after INFO: Wed Mar 11 14:44:36 UTC 2026: Record some cluster info.

User-facing documentation

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

  • added unit tests
  • added e2e tests
  • added regression tests
  • added compatibility tests
  • modified existing tests

How I validated my change

CI

@parametalol parametalol requested a review from janisz as a code owner March 12, 2026 10:08
@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Contributor

rhacs-bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Images are ready for the commit at 26896c5.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.11.x-173-g26896c5ce0.

vikin91
vikin91 reviewed Mar 12, 2026
View reviewed changes
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.68%. Comparing base (b61ea14) to head (217b622).
⚠️ Report is 143 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #19390      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.53%   49.68%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files        2674     2700      +26     
  Lines      201755   203312    +1557     
==========================================
+ Hits        99945   101010    +1065     
- Misses      94348    94775     +427     
- Partials     7462     7527      +65
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 49.68% <ø> (+0.14%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 13, 2026

@parametalol: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/gke-ui-e2e-tests 217b622 link true /test gke-ui-e2e-tests
ci/prow/gke-operator-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test gke-operator-e2e-tests
ci/prow/gke-upgrade-tests 217b622 link false /test gke-upgrade-tests
ci/prow/gke-qa-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test gke-qa-e2e-tests
ci/prow/gke-scanner-v4-install-tests 217b622 link false /test gke-scanner-v4-install-tests
ci/prow/gke-nongroovy-e2e-tests 217b622 link true /test gke-nongroovy-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-12-operator-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-12-operator-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-12-scanner-v4-install-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-12-scanner-v4-install-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-20-operator-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-20-operator-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-20-scanner-v4-install-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-20-scanner-v4-install-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-12-nongroovy-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-12-nongroovy-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-20-nongroovy-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-20-nongroovy-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-20-qa-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-20-qa-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-21-qa-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-21-qa-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-21-nongroovy-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-21-nongroovy-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-21-scanner-v4-install-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-21-scanner-v4-install-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-21-operator-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-21-operator-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-12-qa-e2e-tests 217b622 link false /test ocp-4-12-qa-e2e-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@vikin91 vikin91 vikin91 left review comments

@janisz janisz Awaiting requested review from janisz janisz is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@parametalol @rhacs-bot @vikin91