Conversation
432f1b5 to
1a04daf
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #19546 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 49.26% 49.27% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 2727 2727
Lines 205788 205814 +26
==========================================
+ Hits 101383 101419 +36
+ Misses 96874 96865 -9
+ Partials 7531 7530 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Contributor
|
Images are ready for the commit at 5e8cf1d. To use with deploy scripts, first |
1a04daf to
5e8cf1d
Compare
c-du
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR extends the policy-as-code SecurityPolicy CRD to support cluster label and namespace label scoping. The changes add ClusterLabel and NamespaceLabel fields to the Scope struct in the config-controller API, following the same pattern as the existing Label field.
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/ROX-32155
User-facing documentation
Testing and quality
Automated testing
How I validated my change
Verified that the enw
clusterLabelandnamespaceLabelfields work correctly in SecurityPolicy CRDs:Validated that
ROX_LABEL_BASED_POLICY_SCOPINGmust be enabled in Central for policies using these fields/v1/policiesAPI