Skip to content

ROX-33757: Fix moving to history in clusterentities store#19569

Open
rhacs-bot wants to merge 1 commit intorelease-4.9from
backport-19565-to-release-4.9
Open

ROX-33757: Fix moving to history in clusterentities store#19569
rhacs-bot wants to merge 1 commit intorelease-4.9from
backport-19565-to-release-4.9

Conversation

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhacs-bot rhacs-bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Backport a6eb641 from #19565.

@rhacs-bot rhacs-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 24, 2026 14:28
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/sensor backport PR to backport changes from master to release branch ai-review labels Mar 24, 2026
sourcery-ai[bot]
sourcery-ai bot reviewed Mar 24, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhacs-bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Images are ready for the commit at f784f4a.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.9.5-rc.0-9-gf784f4a1fc.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 24, 2026

/konflux-retest scanner-v4-db-on-push

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 24, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 48.87%. Comparing base (fe8129b) to head (f784f4a).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on release-4.9.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-4.9   #19569      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        48.87%   48.87%   -0.01%     
===============================================
  Files             2719     2719              
  Lines           202915   202914       -1     
===============================================
- Hits             99181    99176       -5     
- Misses           95965    95968       +3     
- Partials          7769     7770       +1
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 48.87% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 24, 2026

@rhacs-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/ocp-dev-preview-nongroovy-e2e-tests f784f4a link false /test ocp-dev-preview-nongroovy-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-next-candidate-nongroovy-e2e-tests f784f4a link false /test ocp-next-candidate-nongroovy-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-21-nongroovy-e2e-tests f784f4a link false /test ocp-4-21-nongroovy-e2e-tests
ci/prow/ocp-4-20-nongroovy-e2e-tests f784f4a link false /test ocp-4-20-nongroovy-e2e-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai[bot] sourcery-ai[bot] left review comments

@vikin91 vikin91 vikin91 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

ai-review area/sensor backport PR to backport changes from master to release branch

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@rhacs-bot @vikin91