Skip to content

ROX-33255: Allow TLS 1.0/1.1 in tlsprofile#19652

Open
vladbologa wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
vb/support-legacy-tls
Open

ROX-33255: Allow TLS 1.0/1.1 in tlsprofile#19652
vladbologa wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
vb/support-legacy-tls

Conversation

@vladbologa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vladbologa vladbologa commented Mar 27, 2026

Description

When implementing the configurable TLS profiles for Go-based Stackrox applications, I chose to reject minimum TLS versions lower than 1.2, to not allow decreasing the Stackrox security posture from the previous hardcoded defaults.

Here I am revisiting that decision. With the upcoming OpenShift cluster-wide TLS profile support (ROX-33336), a cluster admin can configure the Old TLS profile with StrictAllComponents adherence, which requires TLS 1.0. To be compliant, we should accept also these settings. Moreover, PostgreSQL components already accept TLS 1.0/1.1 (they use the literal settings provided to them - see #19160), which would cause an inconsistency in behavior between Stackrox services.

The defaults remain unchanged: TLS 1.2 minimum with AES-256 preferred ciphers. TLS 1.0/1.1 is only used when explicitly requested.

User-facing documentation

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

  • added unit tests
  • added e2e tests
  • added regression tests
  • added compatibility tests
  • modified existing tests

How I validated my change

change me!

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Images are ready for the commit at 176b313.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.11.x-465-g176b3138d2.

@vladbologa vladbologa requested review from a team and porridge and removed request for a team March 27, 2026 12:03
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.37%. Comparing base (804901c) to head (176b313).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #19652      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.34%   49.37%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        2742     2742              
  Lines      206953   206953              
==========================================
+ Hits       102126   102190      +64     
+ Misses      97231    97181      -50     
+ Partials     7596     7582      -14     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 49.37% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@vladbologa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test gke-qa-e2e-tests

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@GrimmiMeloni GrimmiMeloni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vladbologa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test ocp-4-12-qa-e2e-tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants