Skip to content

chore: add CodeRabbit config with review guidance#19671

Closed
robbycochran wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
rc-add-coderabbit-repolevel-3
Closed

chore: add CodeRabbit config with review guidance#19671
robbycochran wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
rc-add-coderabbit-repolevel-3

Conversation

@robbycochran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Add repo-level CodeRabbit configuration that inherits org defaults and adds
review guidance tailored to the stackrox tech stack. The config covers all
major languages (Go, TypeScript, protobuf, YAML, shell, Python, Groovy) and
domain areas (Dockerfiles, database migrations). Static analysis tools are
enabled to complement existing linting.

The config is intentionally kept simple and well-commented so new contributors
can understand it at a glance and the team can refine it over time as recurring
review patterns emerge.

User-facing documentation

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

  • added unit tests
  • added e2e tests
  • added regression tests
  • added compatibility tests
  • modified existing tests

How I validated my change

Config-only change (no code). Validated by reviewing the CodeRabbit v2 schema
and verifying the YAML is well-formed. Functional validation will happen when
CodeRabbit processes this PR (coderabbit-review label added).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ec52f61 chore: add CodeRabbit config with review guidance
d17e8ca chore: disable auto review, inherit label config from org
caba2f3 chore: disable web search in CodeRabbit knowledge base
fe6f08a chore: enable CodeRabbit reviews on draft PRs
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 27, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 27, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added configuration to enhance code review processes and enable static analysis tools for improved code quality assurance during development.

Walkthrough

Added a new .coderabbit.yaml configuration file to define CodeRabbit review settings including path-specific review instructions for Go, TypeScript, Protobuf, YAML, Shell, Python, Groovy, Docker, and database migration files, integrated static analysis tools, and knowledge base configuration.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Repository Configuration
.coderabbit.yaml
New CodeRabbit configuration file defining review behavior profiles, file-type-specific review instructions with concrete checks (error/context handling for Go, accessibility/hooks for TypeScript, protobuf compatibility, YAML CI security, shell safety, migration rollback constraints), integrated static analysis tools (golangci-lint, shellcheck, yamllint, hadolint, semgrep, gitleaks), and knowledge base settings.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: adding a CodeRabbit configuration file with review guidance for the repository.
Description check ✅ Passed The description follows the template structure with all key sections completed: a clear explanation of changes, user-facing documentation and testing/quality checkboxes marked appropriately, and validation details provided for the config-only change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch rc-add-coderabbit-repolevel-3

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 1: The .coderabbit.yaml file has a leading empty line causing YAML lint
failures; open .coderabbit.yaml and remove the initial blank line so the file
starts immediately with the first YAML key, then save and re-run linting (no
other content changes required).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a7782506-b67d-4dd3-8102-6de4990ec63f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0737966 and 57195e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Remove the leading blank line to satisfy YAMLlint.

This file currently fails lint due to an extra empty first line.

Suggested fix
-
 # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
 #
 # CodeRabbit configuration for stackrox/stackrox
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
#
# CodeRabbit configuration for stackrox/stackrox
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.38.0)

[error] 1-1: too many blank lines (1 > 0)

(empty-lines)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 1, The .coderabbit.yaml file has a leading empty
line causing YAML lint failures; open .coderabbit.yaml and remove the initial
blank line so the file starts immediately with the first YAML key, then save and
re-run linting (no other content changes required).

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Images are ready for the commit at 57195e6.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.11.x-474-g57195e6a10.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.38%. Comparing base (f3362c5) to head (57195e6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #19671   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   49.38%   49.38%           
=======================================
  Files        2743     2743           
  Lines      207037   207037           
=======================================
+ Hits       102236   102242    +6     
+ Misses      97218    97213    -5     
+ Partials     7583     7582    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 49.38% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@robbycochran robbycochran deleted the rc-add-coderabbit-repolevel-3 branch March 27, 2026 21:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants