chore: add CodeRabbit config with review guidance#19671
chore: add CodeRabbit config with review guidance#19671robbycochran wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughAdded a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 1: The .coderabbit.yaml file has a leading empty line causing YAML lint
failures; open .coderabbit.yaml and remove the initial blank line so the file
starts immediately with the first YAML key, then save and re-run linting (no
other content changes required).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: a7782506-b67d-4dd3-8102-6de4990ec63f
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml
| @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the leading blank line to satisfy YAMLlint.
This file currently fails lint due to an extra empty first line.
Suggested fix
-
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
#
# CodeRabbit configuration for stackrox/stackrox📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json | |
| # | |
| # CodeRabbit configuration for stackrox/stackrox |
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.38.0)
[error] 1-1: too many blank lines (1 > 0)
(empty-lines)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 1, The .coderabbit.yaml file has a leading empty
line causing YAML lint failures; open .coderabbit.yaml and remove the initial
blank line so the file starts immediately with the first YAML key, then save and
re-run linting (no other content changes required).
|
Images are ready for the commit at 57195e6. To use with deploy scripts, first |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #19671 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 49.38% 49.38%
=======================================
Files 2743 2743
Lines 207037 207037
=======================================
+ Hits 102236 102242 +6
+ Misses 97218 97213 -5
+ Partials 7583 7582 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Description
Add repo-level CodeRabbit configuration that inherits org defaults and adds
review guidance tailored to the stackrox tech stack. The config covers all
major languages (Go, TypeScript, protobuf, YAML, shell, Python, Groovy) and
domain areas (Dockerfiles, database migrations). Static analysis tools are
enabled to complement existing linting.
The config is intentionally kept simple and well-commented so new contributors
can understand it at a glance and the team can refine it over time as recurring
review patterns emerge.
User-facing documentation
Testing and quality
Automated testing
added unit testsadded e2e testsadded regression testsadded compatibility testsmodified existing testsHow I validated my change
Config-only change (no code). Validated by reviewing the CodeRabbit v2 schema
and verifying the YAML is well-formed. Functional validation will happen when
CodeRabbit processes this PR (coderabbit-review label added).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code