Skip to content

ROX-34000: fix reencrypt route with custom cert (#19866)#19888

Open
stehessel wants to merge 1 commit intorelease-4.9from
backport-19866-to-release-4.9
Open

ROX-34000: fix reencrypt route with custom cert (#19866)#19888
stehessel wants to merge 1 commit intorelease-4.9from
backport-19866-to-release-4.9

Conversation

@stehessel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@stehessel stehessel commented Apr 8, 2026

(cherry picked from commit 27bf450)

Description

Backport of 27bf450

@stehessel @claude
ROX-34000: fix reencrypt route with custom cert (#19866)
722b89d 
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 27bf450)
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/helm backport PR to backport changes from master to release branch labels Apr 8, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2026

/konflux-retest scanner-v4-db-on-push

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rhacs-bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Images are ready for the commit at 722b89d.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.9.5-1-g722b89df27.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 47.72%. Comparing base (b4d5dda) to head (722b89d).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-4.9   #19888       +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage        48.87%   47.72%    -1.15%     
================================================
  Files             2719      779     -1940     
  Lines           202912    79017   -123895     
================================================
- Hits             99175    37714    -61461     
+ Misses           95967    37752    -58215     
+ Partials          7770     3551     -4219
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 47.72% <ø> (-1.15%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2026

/konflux-retest operator-bundle-on-push

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 8, 2026

@stehessel: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/gke-upgrade-tests 722b89d link false /test gke-upgrade-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2026

/konflux-retest operator-bundle-on-push

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2026

/konflux-retest operator-bundle-on-push

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area/helm backport PR to backport changes from master to release branch

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stehessel @rhacs-bot