Conversation
|
Hi @kadern0. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a stackrox member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/ok-to-test |
|
Images are ready for the commit at e7f892a. To use with deploy scripts, first |
|
Hi @kadern0. Thank you for addressing this! Now, please help us to fix the G103 alerts: |
|
@kadern0 |
Signed-off-by: Pablo Caderno <kaderno@gmail.com>
6a6df2a to
9dd8f91
Compare
Signed-off-by: Pablo Caderno <kaderno@gmail.com>
9dd8f91 to
d1d0da1
Compare
|
| GitGuardian id | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Generic High Entropy Secret | e7f892a | central/metadata/service/service_impl_test.go | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
Our GitHub checks need improvements? Share your feedbacks!
misberner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. Now that generics exists, it might be good to add a generic atomic (pointer) value to contain the use of unsafe.Pointers to low-level library code (not in this PR). Maybe Uber's atomic library already has something?
Signed-off-by: Pablo Caderno <kaderno@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Tomasz Janiszewski <tomek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Caderno kaderno@gmail.com
Description
As described on #3545, added gosec G103