Skip to content

Conversation

@aldy505
Copy link
Member

@aldy505 aldy505 commented Dec 30, 2025

We're testing against Node 20, which is on maintenance mode right now. Let's test against new versions as well.

Also pinned GHA versions to the commit hash (using actions-up).

@socket-security
Copy link

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action Severity Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Warn Critical
Critical CVE: npm form-data uses unsafe random function in form-data for choosing boundary

CVE: GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 form-data uses unsafe random function in form-data for choosing boundary (CRITICAL)

Affected versions: < 2.5.4; >= 3.0.0 < 3.0.4; >= 4.0.0 < 4.0.4

Patched version: 4.0.4

From: pnpm-lock.yamlnpm/supertest-fetch@1.5.0npm/form-data@4.0.2

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is a critical CVE?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Remove or replace dependencies that include known critical CVEs. Consumers can use dependency overrides or npm audit fix --force to remove vulnerable dependencies.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/form-data@4.0.2. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

Warn High
Obfuscated code: npm safer-buffer is 94.0% likely obfuscated

Confidence: 0.94

Location: Package overview

From: ?npm/safer-buffer@2.1.2

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/safer-buffer@2.1.2. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

Warn High
Obfuscated code: npm vite is 91.0% likely obfuscated

Confidence: 0.91

Location: Package overview

From: package.jsonnpm/vite@7.1.11

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/vite@7.1.11. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

@aldy505 aldy505 requested a review from v1rtl December 31, 2025 12:47
@v1rtl
Copy link
Member

v1rtl commented Jan 2, 2026

Can you make this PR into a single commit instead?

@v1rtl
Copy link
Member

v1rtl commented Jan 2, 2026

Also not sure why we gotta put pinned hashes

Do actions not follow semver?

@aldy505
Copy link
Member Author

aldy505 commented Jan 3, 2026

Can you make this PR into a single commit instead?

You can squash and merge this commit, doing a force push is a hassle.

Also not sure why we gotta put pinned hashes

Do actions not follow semver?

A good security practice that most people (security engineers) recently due.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants