Correction: Revisions to 'any role' term description#437
Merged
stevefaulkner merged 1 commit intogh-pagesfrom Nov 7, 2022
Merged
Correction: Revisions to 'any role' term description#437stevefaulkner merged 1 commit intogh-pagesfrom
stevefaulkner merged 1 commit intogh-pagesfrom
Conversation
related to validator/validator#1425 and #436 cc @stevefaulkner @sideshowbarker as per my comment in #436, here is part of the update I had planned to do to help address this. it is also related to #358, but does NOT close that issue completely. I'm leaving in place the updates that Mike made in the merged PR, but likely will need to revise that column later on as well, so those specific call outs may be moved or changed in the future. Any further changes we would like to see to this text to help here?
stevefaulkner
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
related to validator/validator#1425 and #436
cc @stevefaulkner @sideshowbarker
as per my comment in #436, here is part of the update I had planned to do to help address this.
it is also related to #358, but does NOT close that issue completely.
I'm leaving in place the updates that Mike made in the merged PR, but likely will need to revise that column later on as well, so those specific call outs may be moved or changed in the future.
Any further changes we would like to see to this text to help here?
Preview | Diff