Skip to content

ROX-13318: Fix skipTLSVerify property on Generic Webhook integration form#3605

Merged
vjwilson merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
ROX-13318-fix-Generic-Webhook-integration-skipTLS
Oct 28, 2022
Merged

ROX-13318: Fix skipTLSVerify property on Generic Webhook integration form#3605
vjwilson merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
ROX-13318-fix-Generic-Webhook-integration-skipTLS

Conversation

@vjwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Casing is hard. Fixes a casing typo in one of the fields in the Generic Webhook integration objection.

Checklist

  • Investigated and inspected CI test results

Testing Performed

Manual testing
Screen Shot 2022-10-27 at 5 14 21 PM

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 27, 2022

Images are ready for the commit at 848902d.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=3.72.x-426-g848902d79b.

Copy link
Contributor

@pedrottimark pedrottimark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, complicated :(

  1. The left shift key did not know what the right shift key was doing:
  2. Too bad, so sad. Incorrect local type instead of import correct frontend proto type:
    https://github.com/stackrox/stackrox/blob/master/ui/apps/platform/src/types/notifier.proto.ts#L88

@vjwilson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, complicated :(

  1. The left shift key did not know what the right shift key was doing:

  2. Too bad, so sad. Incorrect local type instead of import correct frontend proto type:
    https://github.com/stackrox/stackrox/blob/master/ui/apps/platform/src/types/notifier.proto.ts#L88

I let the Core Workflows team know about #1, but I'd rather not change it that now that it's "out in the wild".

I removed the locally defined type for this integration, in favor of that import, which addresses #2 for this file.

@vjwilson vjwilson merged commit 951de90 into master Oct 28, 2022
@vjwilson vjwilson deleted the ROX-13318-fix-Generic-Webhook-integration-skipTLS branch October 28, 2022 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants