Skip to content

ROX-31779: [part 2] Fix layout on VM->Nodes pages#18812

Merged
dvail merged 5 commits intodv/ROX-28622-pf-6from
dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-node-results
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

ROX-31779: [part 2] Fix layout on VM->Nodes pages#18812
dvail merged 5 commits intodv/ROX-28622-pf-6from
dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-node-results

Conversation

@dvail
Copy link
Contributor

@dvail dvail commented Feb 3, 2026

Description

Part 2 for VM migration - Nodes pages. (See #18808 for part one).

Hide whitespace is highly recommended

Again, the fixes here are primarily handled by removing all extraneous classname props and wrapper components.

User-facing documentation

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

  • added unit tests
  • added e2e tests
  • added regression tests
  • added compatibility tests
  • modified existing tests

How I validated my change

Updated Cypress tests:
image

Overview:
image
image

CVE Page:
image

Node Page:
image

@dvail
Copy link
Contributor Author

dvail commented Feb 3, 2026

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.38%. Comparing base (731e227) to head (9f4d362).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on dv/ROX-28622-pf-6.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           dv/ROX-28622-pf-6   #18812   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              49.38%   49.38%           
==================================================
  Files                   2659     2659           
  Lines                 200734   200734           
==================================================
+ Hits                   99141    99142    +1     
+ Misses                 94154    94153    -1     
  Partials                7439     7439           
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 49.38% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@dvail dvail force-pushed the dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-node-results branch from d50d938 to 9f4d362 Compare February 3, 2026 20:42
@dvail dvail marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2026 20:44
@dvail dvail requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2026 20:44
Copy link
Contributor

@pedrottimark pedrottimark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Especially thankful to see card and divider in the deleted column.

Base automatically changed from dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-results to dv/ROX-28622-pf-6 February 4, 2026 13:51
@dvail dvail merged commit df79f5d into dv/ROX-28622-pf-6 Feb 4, 2026
149 of 173 checks passed
@dvail dvail deleted the dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-node-results branch February 4, 2026 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants