Skip to content

ROX-31779: [part 3] Fix layout on VM->K8s components pages#18820

Merged
dvail merged 1 commit intodv/ROX-28622-pf-6from
dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-platform-results
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

ROX-31779: [part 3] Fix layout on VM->K8s components pages#18820
dvail merged 1 commit intodv/ROX-28622-pf-6from
dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-platform-results

Conversation

@dvail
Copy link
Contributor

@dvail dvail commented Feb 3, 2026

Description

Part 3 - layout fix for k8s components using the same strategy in parts 1 and 2. As always, hide whitespace.

User-facing documentation

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

  • added unit tests
  • added e2e tests
  • added regression tests
  • added compatibility tests
  • modified existing tests

How I validated my change

image image image image image

@dvail
Copy link
Contributor Author

dvail commented Feb 3, 2026

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@dvail dvail force-pushed the dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-node-results branch from d50d938 to 9f4d362 Compare February 3, 2026 20:42
@dvail dvail force-pushed the dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-platform-results branch from 88e2ec3 to 9af12da Compare February 3, 2026 20:45
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.38%. Comparing base (df79f5d) to head (cf2c313).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dv/ROX-28622-pf-6.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           dv/ROX-28622-pf-6   #18820      +/-   ##
=====================================================
- Coverage              49.39%   49.38%   -0.02%     
=====================================================
  Files                   2659     2659              
  Lines                 200615   200734     +119     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   99097    99133      +36     
- Misses                 94100    94160      +60     
- Partials                7418     7441      +23     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 49.38% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Base automatically changed from dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-node-results to dv/ROX-28622-pf-6 February 4, 2026 13:51
@dvail dvail force-pushed the dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-platform-results branch from 9af12da to cf2c313 Compare February 4, 2026 13:55
@dvail dvail marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2026 13:56
@dvail dvail requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2026 13:56
)}
</CardBody>
</Card>
<Divider component="div" />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After so many deletions of Divider elements, this caught my eye.

What is pro and con to omit between test and description list, especially if text blurb (that states the obvious) under tabs is not a pattern in OpenShift Console pages.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

text blurb under tabs is not a pattern in OpenShift Console pages

This is the part that made me keep the dividers here. There isn't a good example from the console that shows the same, and my subjective opinion was that the divider between text and rest of content looked good (or at least the inverse looked out of place). Not sure if this is just familiarity with these pages or not, but I'm open to getting rid of this in a second round of follow ups. Right now, I was leaning towards less changes instead of more, unless there was a clear precedent in the console to follow.

@dvail dvail merged commit 6543dee into dv/ROX-28622-pf-6 Feb 4, 2026
77 of 88 checks passed
@dvail dvail deleted the dv/ROX-31779-fix-vm-platform-results branch February 4, 2026 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants