Skip to content

ROX-27060: Konflux Backporting for 4.6, Batch 5#15818

Merged
msugakov merged 41 commits intorelease-4.6from
patch-5/release-4.6
Jun 30, 2025
Merged

ROX-27060: Konflux Backporting for 4.6, Batch 5#15818
msugakov merged 41 commits intorelease-4.6from
patch-5/release-4.6

Conversation

@ajheflin
Copy link
Contributor

@ajheflin ajheflin commented Jun 24, 2025 •
edited by msugakov
Loading

Description

Obtained via:

git cherry-pick e50cca86 177bdd27 5b14b921 56f99d23 927d9e42 906ce49b a7719c86 4e37d272 abf4ab5d 20cb274c 17c1c88e 7ea68877 8d84227e 3f03f3c1 d55ccf80 2f1bc556 26433fd1 28ae5790 e0dfd474 6e3788f1 3c401f26 cf0e956a b9102a84 266843e9 d7a17555 6999ad5c ff9efc9e be553227 0309e52d d2da2733 de70e47e 68f35eef 0e97ec51 08bef6f8 f99d7455 390856f1

@ajheflin
Copy link
Contributor Author

ajheflin commented Jun 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This change is part of the following stack:

Change managed by git-spice.

This was referenced Jun 24, 2025
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/helm area/operator area/postgres area/scanner area/ci backport PR to backport changes from master to release branch labels Jun 24, 2025
@ajheflin ajheflin added the konflux-build Run Konflux in PR. Push commit to trigger it. label Jun 24, 2025
@ajheflin ajheflin mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2025
Merged
@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Contributor

rhacs-bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Images are ready for the commit at daaee89.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.6.7-96-gdaaee89543.

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Contributor

rhacs-bot commented Jun 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Images are ready for the commit at 137338b.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.6.7-45-g137338b235.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 48.42%. Comparing base (d6042bc) to head (137338b).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-4.6   #15818      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        48.26%   48.42%   +0.16%     
===============================================
  Files             2470     2470              
  Lines           178528   178528              
===============================================
+ Hits             86168    86459     +291     
+ Misses           85421    85115     -306     
- Partials          6939     6954      +15
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 48.42% <ø> (+0.16%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@ajheflin ajheflin force-pushed the patch-5/release-4.6 branch from daaee89 to 7dfecfd Compare June 25, 2025 17:21
@msugakov msugakov force-pushed the patch-4/release-4.6 branch from 699d226 to 972396d Compare June 26, 2025 15:08
Base automatically changed from patch-4/release-4.6 to release-4.6 June 27, 2025 08:27
@msugakov msugakov force-pushed the patch-5/release-4.6 branch from 7dfecfd to 87150ad Compare June 27, 2025 08:29
msugakov and others added 8 commits June 27, 2025 18:49
@msugakov msugakov force-pushed the patch-5/release-4.6 branch from 87150ad to 3214165 Compare June 27, 2025 17:02
@msugakov msugakov marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2025 17:02
@msugakov msugakov requested review from a team as code owners June 27, 2025 17:02
@msugakov msugakov requested review from porridge and removed request for a team June 27, 2025 17:02
@msugakov msugakov mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2025
Closed
@msugakov
Copy link
Contributor

msugakov commented Jun 27, 2025

/cancel

@msugakov msugakov mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2025
Merged
4 tasks
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@ajheflin: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/gke-scanner-v4-tests 137338b link false /test gke-scanner-v4-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@msugakov
Copy link
Contributor

msugakov commented Jun 28, 2025

/test ocp-4-18-nongroovy-e2e-tests

@msugakov
Copy link
Contributor

msugakov commented Jun 28, 2025

/retest central-db-on-push

@msugakov
Copy link
Contributor

msugakov commented Jun 28, 2025

/retest operator-bundle-on-push

@stackrox stackrox deleted a comment from openshift-ci bot Jun 30, 2025
@stackrox stackrox deleted a comment from openshift-ci bot Jun 30, 2025
@msugakov msugakov merged commit f2ec593 into release-4.6 Jun 30, 2025
106 of 115 checks passed
@msugakov msugakov deleted the patch-5/release-4.6 branch June 30, 2025 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@msugakov msugakov msugakov approved these changes

@tommartensen tommartensen Awaiting requested review from tommartensen

@porridge porridge Awaiting requested review from porridge porridge is a code owner automatically assigned from stackrox/install

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area/ci area/helm area/operator area/postgres area/scanner backport PR to backport changes from master to release branch konflux-build Run Konflux in PR. Push commit to trigger it.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ajheflin @rhacs-bot @msugakov @tommartensen